"The UN Human Rights Council’s lousy election" https://www.economist.com/international/2018/10/17/the-un-human-rights-councils-lousy-election The article is inferring that: Because of the council acts as "a protector of human-rights abusers and a cesspool of political bias", the important decisions shouldn't go wrong, however, the election of human-rights abusers to the UN’s human-rights body plays into President Trump’s hand. I believe that this event will be viewed as "beginning of human rights to be issued as the underlying factor that led the issues until today" Two WOK: Reason and language. Subjectively, a reason can be linked as we need to find a plausible and justifiable solution to resolve this problem unimpededly.
